le mans 1966 ford beats ferrari: the photo henry ford cheated to get and how it cost him the race

above: amon, shelby, mclaren from ford team.

below: the le mans 1966 ferrari 330 p3

below: ford vs ferrari – the ford GT40 MK2 prototype that henry ford promised would beat ferrari after the acquisition of ferrari by ford collapsed

 

since 1966 and the well-known “photo-op” finish with the three ford MK2 prototypes crossing the line yards apart, the controversy of a conspiracy by the french organizers to deprive ford of an all-american finish has raged in america. so what really happened that gave the victory to the # 2 car, driven by bruce mclaren and chris amon, both new zealanders?

dan gurney and jerry grant, driving the shelby team #3 car, led from the beginning, utterly dominating the ferraris and all the other fords, until 2 hours from the end when without any warning.  as they were cruising to a sure win, the engine simply packed up. meanwhile, the opposition faded away, and after 23 hours, ken miles, driving the # 1 car, had nearly a full lap lead over the # 2 car and two more over the surviving holman & moody ford MK2 driven by dick hutcherson. miles was cruising to the finish, when during his last pit stop he received an order from carroll shelby, talking to him inside the car. the wording of this order was never revealed in public, but the reply was. miles did not take this lightly and replied, in a loud voice, “so ends my contribution to this bloody motor race” …as he knew perfectly well what could happen if he complied with the order from the ford “brass”. indeed, miles was one of the few in the shelby crew who had taken the time to read the organizing automobile club de l’ouest rules.
mclaren took over the # 2 car during its last pit stop, where he told chris amon, “ford wants a photo finish” and amon replied, “who is supposed to win?” to which mclaren replied, “i don’t know, but I’m not going to lose!”

the simple truth is that ford, represented by henry ford II, simply did not grasp the consequences of their decision, implemented as an order to shelby and in turn, to ken miles. miles had won at daytona and sebring, and would be the first ever to win all three events the same year, something that ford surely would have used for advertising their racing success worldwide.

after the three cars crossed the finish line, miles first, then mclaren about 15 yards behind with hutcherson in tow, crew chief john collins, chief mechanic charlie agapiou, and several members of the #1 crew began pushing the car towards the podium, only to be stopped by ACO officials and told that they were in fact in second place.

what had taken place, is that ferrari’s mauro forghieri, in a revengeful and spiteful move possibly engineered by a telephone call from maranello, had lodged an unofficial protest to the racing direction, pointing out that while the miles-hulme car had indeed crossed the finish line 15 yards ahead of the mclaren-amon identical car, it had started the race 40 yards behind it so had covered a shorter distance, and did not win. the french officials, who would have preferred the red ferrari cars to win, seized the suggestion and immediately demoted the true winner of the race to second place, creating controversy and bitterness, likely in an attempt to ruin the ford celebrations of the stomping ferrari suffered. three years earlier, ford attempted to buy ferrari as a concern, and as the commendatore nearly signed the paperwork, he had second thoughts and backed away from the agreed deal. ford then swore to beat ferrari on the track, and indeed in 1966, they did just that, all the works and works-supported ferraris having broken down hours earlier in an attempt to keep up with the faster armada of american cars.

over the years, the many testimonies, accusations, innuendos and the like by english, french, italian and german language period press really never resolved the issue to anyone’s satisfaction, but the simple truth is that henry ford II made a mistake, that of ignorance, and missed a great chance of more publicity for his own personal triumph and revenge over enzo ferrari.

carroll shelby passed away a short time ago, taking with him many unpublished secrets, but not so secret to his close friends… – excerpts from electric dreams. by dd

xwing star fighter down

even star fighters go down… star wars x wing star fighter on the deck of USS long island airplane carrier.  this makes the F22 actually look good. by xy

Ford GT40: 24 Hours Le Mans 1968

a follow up to the ford ft40 story post by cp. i never thought i would have cared to go to a car race, been invited to formula 1s a few times, but if i could back in the 60’s i’d go to le mans any day. by dd

1965 Ford GT40

an ultra-rare ford gt40 is estimated to reach $3million at an auction in arizona. the ford gt40 was the result of an upset henry ford II, after ford motor company bought ferrari and invested millions towards the enzo. henry then directed his racing division to develop an endurance racer capable of beating ferrari on the world stage, and the ford gt40 went on to beat ferrari and to win at le mans in 1966, 1967, 1968 and 1969. by cp

1668 lamborghini bertone miura roadster

miura svj interior-note the bertone emblem

why are modern cars so ugly again? just a reminder; 474 miura were built from 1966-69, 140 between 1968-71 and only 150 between 1971-72. but the bertone roadster version? only 1 was ever made. now that’s a luxury. miura is what you get when you work late at night on your own time….

“during 1965, lamborghini’s three top engineers, gian paolo dallara, paolo stanzani and bob wallace, put their own time into the development of a prototype car known as the p400. the engineers envisioned a road car with racing pedigree – a car which could win on the track and be driven on the road by enthusiasts. the three men worked on the car’s design at night, hoping to sway lamborghini from the opinion that such a vehicle would be too expensive and would distract from the company’s focus. when finally brought aboard, lamborghini allowed his engineers to go ahead, deciding that the P400 was a potential marketing tool, if nothing more… the rest was history.” by dd

shelter serra and helmut lang

grey area artist shelter serra will have his sculptures featured in helmut lang boutiques in new york, london and los angeles.  nephew of minimalist sculptor richard serra, shelter utilizes unique materials in order to exhibit usages and other depictions of everyday objects.  the grey area x helmut lang will feature vintage american car engines from the 1960’s and 1970’s. by sv

master forgery: fake Bugatti Type 51 fetches £250,000

“this is a very skilfully executed replica of a 1931 bugatti which won the casablanca grand prix”. the copy of a bugatti type 51 had been lying unused in a garage in hartlebury, worcestershire for nine years. the car had been owned by car enthusiast alan riley, who believed it to be the original bugatti driven by count stanislas czaykowski in races in the 1930s, but the car was recently examined by david sewell, a bugatti expert, who decided it was a replica made using a mixture of genuine and reproduction parts, including some from the czaykowski vehicle. despite this, the car fetched £250,000 at an auction… an original would have been worth over £2,000,000. fortunately, admiring it is for free. by dd

1:1 scale model of aston martin’s evanta 1959

a 1:1 scale model of aston martin’s evanta 1959 le mans winner to be auctioned. included in this  kit are four aston martin wire wheels with dunlop race tires, a “mota lita” 15″ wood-rimmed aston martin steering wheel, a pair of race seats, an aluminum gear knob and lever, a full dashboard, a replica of the le mans trophy, and an aston martin cap signed by roy salvadori and carroll shelby, who drove the original to victory at the 1959 24 Hours of Le Mans. by cp

NSU Motorenwerke: NSU RO-80 suspiciously early audi looking

NSU motorenweke RO 80

1970’s audi 100GLaudio R8 advertising (history) i’m not seeing the NSU?

well it is… NSU was a lesser known german company founded in 1873 and eventually acquired by the VW group in 1969 who merged it with auto union and evolved it into audi and that answers the resemblance. it was a new discovery for me. by dd