moon: how the moon was created and why its not much different than earth in composition

the moon has remained largely unchanged during human history

for a long time it has been thought that the moon was result of an impact between the early earth and another planet-sized object, thea, 4.5 billion years ago.  this is of course, way before god actually created earth in just three days leaving the other three for the heavens.

“but this theory predicts earth and its satellite, the moon, should have a quite different chemical make-up – but the data shows in fact they are very similar (the oxygen isotope, or atom type, compositions on earth are identical to that on the moon.). now, new modeling, explored in two papers published this week by the journal science, reveals that if the earth had a much faster spin before the impact, the theory fits the chemistry.

the giant impact hypothesis was first posited in the 1970s. it holds that the moon formed from the debris kicked into orbit by the collision of a smaller proto-planet with the infant earth. but the early models indicated that much of this debris would have originated from the impactor, whose composition would most probably have differed substantially from that of earth.

the new run simulations show that the early earth was rotating on its axis in just a few hours prior to the impact – compared to the present 24 hours. in such a scenario, the team could get debris material thrown into a moon-forming disc around the earth that had the right chemical make-up. in other words, it was substantial earth material from its mantle that was ejected in the collision.

after the impact, the gravitational interaction between the sun and the moon could then have slowed the fast rotation of the earth to the speed we now experience. a different team simulated a different route, their simulations involved larger impactors hitting an earth of comparable size and at comparatively lower speeds. again, the team was able to produce a moon with the same chemical composition as the earth. addressing the questions about the impact theory and why the compositions where so close.” from BBC by xy

lionel hun: dance of hope

you may have seen this but i like it as the movements are less literal and more liquid. a nice mixture of street and classical done well. here is lionel hun dancer/choreographer performing in tokyo during the tōhoku earthquake and tsunami. four days after he evacuated to macau where he decided to express his love for japan by making this performance. by kc

two prophets: albert interprets fyodor

camus discusses his interpretation of fyodor dostoevsky’s the possessed (also known as the devils, or demons) into a play.  the bon vivant says here that, “prophetic things tend to become topical” …i would say the opposite is also apparent.  this is for those who think too much, as well as the ones who don’t think enough. by sv

nina nina

 

my personal nina simone marathon is continuing.  almost two weeks now.  she’s looking pretty fancy here.  not the best live performance, but regardless, one of my favorite songs.  so much love for this enchanting creature. by sv

Amon tobin: live

i am taking everyone to see this on friday in berkeley CA. i am very excited. here is the trailer for amon tobin’s all new, highly ambitious, breathtaking live show.

“tobin will be stepping away from previous DJ centric performances, and instead will be providing a large scale live audio/visual experience to select cities around the world.” by ht